Retest arrival for Gap 3b / V2-1 / V2-2: verifying the capture → attach_arrival_to_idea → confirm_edge → source_lineage_query → fleeting_note_query round-trip.
auris-retest · auris-retest:agent
Aviation KOS
Knowledge organisation workspace
Knowledge base MVP
Capture arrivals, triage signal, spawn notes through resolution edges, and curate the resulting idea graph.
Paste raw material as an arrival vertex.
Mark useful arrivals as signal; resolution creates notes later.
Retest arrival for Gap 3b / V2-1 / V2-2: verifying the capture → attach_arrival_to_idea → confirm_edge → source_lineage_query → fleeting_note_query round-trip.
auris-retest · auris-retest:agent
The more I think about competency-oriented learning, the more I come to the conclusion that this is not only useful for the aviation domain, but rather that we have to master competency-based learning itself to have a scientific foundation for building the aviation training system further.
telegram-roleplay · roleplay:stakeholder-unattributed
To really see training progress of individuals like pilots, one needs to infer competency based on observable behavior.
telegram-roleplay · roleplay:stakeholder-unattributed
(attachment)
agent-workspace · auris-agent
Stress test: provenanceTimestamp far in the past.
stress-test · stress-test
Stress test: provenanceTimestamp far in the future.
stress-test · stress-test
Stress test: provenanceTimestamp without milliseconds.
stress-test · stress-test
Stress test: provenanceTimestamp with timezone offset rather than Z.
stress-test · stress-test
Stress test: capturedItemId provided by the caller — first write.
stress-test · stress-test
Image: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement (Paul Graham, "How to Disagree"). Seven-level pyramid, bottom to top: name-calling, ad hominem, responding to tone, contradiction, counterargument, refutation, refuting the central point. Brand: NEUROPSYCH / BT. Stakeholder context (roleplay): plausibly raised in the channel as a model for productive evaluator disagreement during calibration — maps onto M.DisagreementLoop and T.Standardization-vs-Calibration.
telegram-roleplay · roleplay:stakeholder-unattributed
Smoke test it now
telegram · mike-dyson
(attachment)
auris-research · auris-research:agent
(attachment)
auris-research · auris-research:instructor
Candidate showed correct procedure but hesitation before each step — suggests implicit doubt
telegram · auris-research:instructor
At 500ft DA, candidate reverted to primary scan only — altitude and airspeed, no ILS cross-check
telegram · auris-research:instructor
Post-flight candidate said: I knew the procedure but didn't feel confident
telegram · auris-research:candidate
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
(attachment)
auris-agent-workspace · auris-agent
I think I perceived C1 ember as the volcano color.
telegram · mike-dyson
(attachment)
auris-workspace · auris
(attachment)
auris-workspace · auris
(attachment)
workspace_file · workspace_file
sadsad
chat · u-demo
(attachment)
workspace_file · workspace_file
(attachment)
chat · mike-dyson
(attachment)
chat · mike-dyson
(attachment)
chat · mike-dyson
(attachment)
chat · mike-dyson
(attachment)
chat · thorsten-rösch
Multi-turn voice-note and text dialogue exploring: CBTA intellectual foundations (McClelland, Bloom, Ericsson, Dreyfus, Gagné); FORDEC and broader learning/neuroscience models; FAA CBTA reassessment 2026 (two-track analysis); Deliberate Practice vs SBT vs CBTA as three distinct abstraction levels; Dreyfus five-stage model and the qualitative mode shift at Stage 4-5; expertise defined operationally; category-theory reduction of five initial design challenges to two fundamentals (latent variable inference and path optimisation); spawning of five atomic notes with eight annotated links.
dialogue_session · dialogue_session
Research file: Theoretical Foundations of CBTA in Aviation. Covers intellectual origins (Taylor, Bobbitt, Tyler, Bloom, McClelland, Dreyfus, Spencer & Spencer, Ericsson, Lave & Wenger, Gagné), ICAO document lineage, the nine core pilot competencies and Observable Behavior structure, CBTA vs EBT distinction, and tensions in the framework (no efficacy RCT data, OB reductionism, instructor calibration, graduation standard gap, transfer of learning).
workspace_file · workspace_file
Research file: FORDEC and Learning Models. Covers FORDEC origin (Hörmann/DLR 1995), CRM context, critique (Soll et al. 2016, Klein RPD), Dreyfus five-stage model, Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller), Dual-Process Theory (Kahneman), deliberate practice (Ericsson), Kolb, Vygotsky ZPD, Kirkpatrick, ADDIE, neuroplasticity, sleep consolidation, chunking, and integration arc showing how FOR-DEC/CLT/deliberate practice/dual-process form a coherent explanatory arc for CBTA scenario-based design.
workspace_file · workspace_file
Research file: FAA CBTA Reassessment 2026. Two parallel tracks: Track 1 (CBTA safety evidence evaluation, REDAC 2023 recommendation, no published methodology) and Track 2 (Part 141 Modernization, NFTA 471-page report, docket FAA-2024-2531, comment period closed May 11 2026). Triggers, stakeholder positions (ALPA skeptical/defensive of 1500-hr rule, Boeing/IATA/CAE supportive), what is and is not in the public record.
workspace_file · workspace_file
Dialogue session reviewing KOS sensemaking conceptually. Covered: (1) the three-rooms model — capture, distillation, commitment as distinct phases; (2) the atomic note as the operative unit with five conditions; (3) the network as the epistemic product; (4) concept-orientation enabling free linking; (5) provenance as epistemic status signal. Identified as relevant but not formalized: triage decision rule is unspecified; concept-orientation assumes clarity at write time, which may not hold; expert knowledge has no natural arrival to point to; multi-actor reconciliation has no interim guidance; atomicity grain has no calibration heuristic; confidence marking lacks anchor examples. Cross-domain connection made: KOS sensemaking externalizes the same pattern-building process deliberate practice theory describes neurologically.
dialogue_session · dialogue_session